1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,836
    Turkey have supplied Ukraine with drones.......perhaps that was not in the hillbilly gazette?

    Thinskin
     
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,408
    Uh Oh .............
     
  3. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    And when did that start...Ukraine using Turkish drones?...

     
  4. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,836


    Perhaps this was not covered by the hillbilly gazette as they are focussed on still and banjo thefts?:rolleyes:



    Thinskin
     
  5. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,408
    We see that yet again anon's lack of reading comprehension has caused him embarrassment;
    "The president plans to spend the weekend at home, even though some criticized him for the optics of not caring about the ongoing conflict or the current state of the country by leaving Washington, DC."
    Shooter can help.
    You see, Anon, the criticism was about the APPEARANCE (optics) of not caring about the conflict or the current state of the country. Now, Shooter is pretty sure, anon doesn't care a grasshopper fart about appearances, and frankly, neither does Shooter, but Shooter can see we're about to jump down the rabbit hole and get all bunched up talking about how Trump played golf and charged his body guards rent to stay at Mar a lago, and then someone will bring up how biden charged rent to the secret service when he was the VP (Biden Charges Secret Service to Rent Cottage Next to His Home | Fox News )and then anon or another despicable will point out how biden didn't gouge and besides, that was a long time ago, and then a deplorable will point out that biden has gone home to Deleware like 23 out of 36 weeks, and trump took 4 hours to play golf anyway, and before you know it we'll be lost.

    Oh, and anon, the last time shooter played "victim" he was 6 years old and the little red haired girl from down the street tried to make him wear a ribbon in his hair.
    She failed, and so do you.
    Neither Shooter or any non despicable will be silenced by the spew of despicables.

    Lets go anon!
     
  6. silkythighs

    silkythighs Porn Star

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2019
    Messages:
    37,262
    Turkey claims these are simply sales to the government of Ukraine and is not to be interpreted as siding against Russia. :confused:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    So, Trump didn't have to care about the optics? You've got double standards.

    Oh, and your personal insults? Just shows you for the hypocrite you are.
     
    1. shootersa
      Clearly, Trump has never been much of a worrier over optics.
      But that isn't the issue is it?
      The issue remains your poor reading comprehension causing you ongoing embarrassment when you try to insult someone or something.
      Smack it again.
       
      shootersa, Mar 5, 2022
    2. Scotchlass
      I keep telling you guys, it's ESL.
      They're all either English as a Second Language foreigners (probably Russian mob) or less advanced, poorly designed bots.
       
      Scotchlass, Mar 5, 2022
  8. Odins own

    Odins own Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2021
    Messages:
    4,377
    Jumping up & down about a tank or missile unit being taken out in this war is like celebrating a destroyed German tank on D-Day :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • wtf wtf x 1
  9. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Ukraine president held a zoom call with members of Congress. They were specifically asked to stay off social media during the call for his security.

    But if course a couple treasonous conservative Republicans could not resist grandstanding and had to tweet about it. But at least they didn't personally call Putin and give him the location.
     
    • wtf wtf x 1
  10. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,408
    OOOHH!
    Thinskin is a bit bitchy today!
    [​IMG]

    So, lets see do we understand thinskin's rant.
    NATO can do nothing concerning Ukraine without bidens approval.
    Biden refuses cause, you know, biden.
    Shooter is a dick.

    That about cover it?
    Kay.
    Lets proceed

    NATO can do nothing concerning Ukraine without bidens approval.
    Well, thinskin, this is incorrect. The United States, despite paying the lions share of NATOS costs, does not have veto power over what NATO does. In fact, Turkey established a "No Sail zone" blocking Russian war ships from entering the black sea through the Dardanelles and Bosphorus Straits. This has really pissed off Putin. And guess what? It didn't take a unanimous anything from NATO or it's members. Any more than sending military and humanitarian aid requires a unanimous agreement from NATO. So, your claim that America holds VETO powers in NATO is incorrect.
    If you have something that says Biden can veto NATO actions in the Ukraine, lets see it. For the record, Shooter will reject any pundit opinions on the matter. Lets see the NATO charter or something equally official.​
    Biden refuses cause, you know, biden.
    Well the press secretary, Psaki, says biden doesn't want to be put in the position of shooting down Russians, you know, like we did in Bosnia and Libya, but now some American politicians are beginning to offer up the opinion that "fuck Putin, shoot the fuckers down". And they're pretty much all deplorables, so that probably causes your eyes to twitch, finding out that your position aligns with deplorables for once.
    For the record, Shooter supports a no fly zone as long as it isn't US planes enforcing it, cause, you know, not really our fight, kind of thing. Same for putting troops on the ground.
    This is, for now, a European problem and while the US has some interest in the outcome, and will be supporting our allies, it should not be our job to put boots on the ground and planes in the air and ships in the black sea to stop Russian aggression against Ukraine.
    That's your dog to fight, at least for now, don't you agree?
    Or is it you want the US to do your fighting for you again, cause you know, chickenshits?​
    Shooter is a dick.
    Yes. Shooter has a dick.
    And no, Shooter has no questions for the likes of a dutch dickhead like you.
    Now, back the fuck out of Shooters face. Your breath is awful.
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    1. View previous comments...
    2. shootersa
      Could be.
      But our dog ain't big enough in this fight to worry about it until putin opens his silos, is it?
       
      shootersa, Mar 5, 2022
    3. Russell Shackleford
      He already has them ready and said a no fly zone will be considered as NATO entering the war
       
      Russell Shackleford, Mar 5, 2022
    4. shootersa
      He said he has a big dick too. I believe it when I see it.
       
      shootersa, Mar 6, 2022
    5. stumbler
      So you want to get the US in a shooting war with Russia is that what you are telling us? Do you think Putin will put up with the US and NATO wiping out his dysfunctional military or will he resort to using nuclear weapons?
       
      stumbler, Mar 6, 2022
    6. shootersa
      First, if you read Shooters post you would know that; "Shooter supports a no fly zone as long as it isn't US planes enforcing it, cause, you know, not really our fight, kind of thing. Same for putting troops on the ground."​
      Now, if European nations are enforcing a no fly zone over Ukraine, how does that get the US in a shooting war with Putin?
      It doesn't, does it?
      Also, we should remember that Turkey pretty much unilaterally decided to impose a "no ship" zone to block Russian ships from entering the Black Sea. Has Putin unlimbered his nukes as a result?
      NO.
      And finally will Putin resort to nukes if his military is destroyed? No one but Putin and his generals can answer that question. But whatever, we cannot forget that Putin started this fucking war, and if Putin decides to launch nukes then that's on him, not on NATO, not on the US, and not on deplorables. It's on Putin, and Putin and Russia will pay the price for that.
       
      shootersa, Mar 6, 2022
  11. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,058
    I have never seen a dog with such long, sharp teeth before. :eek:
     
  12. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,408
    Shooter knows that dog is all bad breath and growl, but no bite.
    Like our dog; the only thing she's ever bitten is her food.
    But to watch her go after the squirrels and rabbits you'd think she was defending freedom.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    I ask a legitimate question and now you're worried about the Still and Banjo?...as they are the bedrock of certain life styles they are.

    The earliest that I can tell a contract was signed in 2019 by Ukraine and the Turkish Governments, to buy some Drones...now I'm not sure if you tried to answer the legitimate question that I asked, or you're just being a dick...either way... if the Russians have convoys 40 miles long or what the fuck ever it is, the drones would make short work of the invasion if this wasn't such a dog and pony show that Crime Boss Biden and the Ho /NATO/Half cracker/Soros have pushed to create another crisis to take away from the destruction efforts of American Exceptionalism.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,836
    Ukranian foreign legion is growing........kudos to all of them!



    Thinskin
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. Russell Shackleford
      I heard one of these idiots posted his location on Facebook and got like 40 Ukrainians blown up
       
      Russell Shackleford, Mar 6, 2022
    2. Russell Shackleford
      I also saw some of them wearing surgical masks while they were waiting to go get slaughtered in WW3
       
      Russell Shackleford, Mar 6, 2022
  15. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,836
    • Like Like x 1
    1. shootersa
      chickenshit dutch want the US to fight their battles for them again?
       
      shootersa, Mar 6, 2022
    2. TheRam
      You can count on Joe leaving her behind.
       
      TheRam, Mar 8, 2022
    3. thinskin
      It is a her genius!:rolleyes:

      ts
       
      thinskin, Mar 8, 2022
  16. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,836
    Turkey blocks Black Sea access to Russian warships.



    Thinskin
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. TheRam

    TheRam Porn Star

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,196
    Ukrainian Grandma telling Putin what’s what

    C9F97BD5-8004-4826-AA0C-98B3EA71B704.jpeg
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    1. shootersa
      Shooter blushes at the evidence that he shamelessly took advantage of a photo op to let supreme commander know Shooter is on the job!
       
      shootersa, Mar 6, 2022
  18. Scotchlass

    Scotchlass Porn Star

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2017
    Messages:
    2,345
    Russia needs to take Kiev to install a pro-Russia puppet regime.
    Kiev is surrounded by rivers on two sides, so once taken, it will be relatively easy for the Red Army to isolate and cut off resupply to the insurgents.
    Insurgencies often tend to be widespread but brittle; when they crack, they can crack all over the war zone.
    As the Ukrainian resistance, especially in Kiev, begins to run out of ammunition and other necessary supplies, it will begin to suffer increasing losses in key personnel.
    What happens then in Kiev and Ukraine in general (will it be like Syria or more like Afghanistan), only God knows.

    And of course, this is all complicated tenfold by the completely incompetent Biden administration.
    (Kamala: Ukraine is a country in Europe. Russia is a country in Europe. Russia is a larger country who has invaded a smaller country... Europe's on fire but hey, let's instead concentrate on domestic LGBQ+ issues. Or Anthony Blinken (AKA Captain Obvious)? His latest pronouncement is that we may have a refugee crisis brewing!! How does he even still have a job after the Afghanistan fiasco and now Ukraine?)


    Lessons from Forecasting the Ukraine War
    Richard Hanania
    Feb 28

    Given that I’ve made quite a few predictions about the war in Ukraine and how it would unfold, now is a good time to look back on them and draw some lessons. My record is mixed, having predicted that the war would happen but being, so far, mistaken about how strong Ukrainian resistance would be.
    ______

    My reasoning was similar (to Afghanistan) when it came to thinking about a potential Russian invasion of Ukraine. I thought that there were difficult realities others weren’t facing, namely that Russia had overwhelming military power over Ukraine and it was in a tough security situation due to NATO expansion and deepening military ties between Kiev and Washington. Probably overlearning from Afghanistan, I thought an American client state without a strong conventional army of its own would fall relatively easily. I therefore predicted the Russian invasion (correct) and a quick collapse by the Ukrainians (wrong).
    ______

    I had written on why I thought there wouldn’t be an insurgency in Ukraine, which if my arguments were sound would have removed another reason why one might have expected Russia to think twice before invading. People talk about the American and Soviet wars in Afghanistan illustrating the dangers of occupation, but I thought this would be more like Syria, where Russia succeeded because it had effective partners on the ground, was willing to use as much force as necessary, and did not try to engage in social engineering. My thinking was that this wasn’t a US invasion, where troops are sent to the other side of the world to build girls’ schools for 20 years and form an entirely new society among people they know nothing about. Russia would be replacing a pro-American oligarchy with a pro-Russian one, either through installing a puppet regime or outright annexation. And it would be fighting to win a war, not provide jobs for NGO types or give politicians sound bites. That was my thinking at least, and this theory turned out to be mostly wrong, at least in its more extreme form. But it looks like Putin might have bought into the same logic, which is why he has invaded Ukraine and made some otherwise puzzling decisions along the way, like not fully utilizing his advantage in the air.
    ____

    Part of the reason I came to the right conclusion was that I was even more pessimistic than most anti-interventionists were about the degree of rationality present in American foreign policy. For example, my friend Max Abrahms was saying until very recently that Putin was hoping for some concessions that would allow him to avoid war (to be fair, Max has been more correct than me on the invasion running into difficulties). I thought that was possible too, but I had little hope that American politics would allow Biden to strike a deal. When it became clear that negotiating over the NATO open door policy wasn’t even on the table, I increased my estimate of the probability for war.
    ___

    Regarding the prediction that there would be no insurgency, it is not technically false yet, since the conventional phase of the war is still ongoing, but I have to be honest and say that I expected a lot less fighting than we’re seeing. As already mentioned, I thought it might be like the fall of Kabul, where the weaker side just melted away even if it could’ve theoretically held out longer.


    My argument that Ukraine did not have a high enough TFR (Total Fertility Rate, usually simply described as the average number of children per woman which makes it an intuitive measure of fertility) to tolerate the casualties required for an asymmetric conflict may well have been motivated reasoning, based on my view that not having enough children is a sign of moral and spiritual decline. We’ll see soon enough if the view was well founded or not, as a Ukrainian collapse is still possible, even if it takes longer than I would have thought. Similarly, a source of wishful thinking here might have been my suspicion that, if there was a more sustained conflict, it would mean a great deal of Western involvement, which would raise the risk of nuclear war.

    I also didn't anticipate the strength of the Western response. In part, this was because of how American and European leaders talked before the war. If you were going to cut Russia off from SWIFT, for example, why wouldn’t you announce it beforehand? The whole point of a punishment like that is supposed to be its deterrent effect, but if you don’t communicate that a specific action will happen, then it can’t influence behavior. The answer here seems to be a lack of grand strategy, with leaders responding to events according to emotion and public relations more than anything. Cutting off SWIFT, or even threatening to do so, seems extreme before an invasion occurs, but not after it has begun. This kind of irrationality is something I should’ve anticipated, given I wrote a book in which the main argument was that this is exactly how politicians behave.

    Now, we shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves, as Russia is still making rapid progress. It took the US three weeks to take Baghdad, and as I write this we are still less than 5 days into the invasion of Ukraine and fighting has reached the capital. This might still work out for the Russian government, if not its people, if it takes Kiev, is willing to absorb the economic fallout, and then potentially negotiates from a position of strength as the US and EU face their own economic problems resulting from high energy prices and retaliatory sanctions. But even a “successful” war is going to cost a lot more than I thought it would in blood and treasure.

    https://richardhanania.substack.com/p/lessons-from-forecasting-the-ukraine?s=r
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2022
    1. BigSuzyB
      You already know Ukraine doesn’t matter to the US, it’s also important to know there’s no moral case for supporting Ukraine either. A country that arrests the opposition and bans media in an entire language is no “democracy.”
       
      BigSuzyB, Mar 6, 2022
    2. Scotchlass
      I absolutely do not want to see us (or NATO) involved in a land war there. I also agree with you that Ukraine is corrupt. Three things though:

      1) Russia is an aggressor here. If not confronted here and seeing the West's dithering response, what stops Putin from going after Poland or the Baltic's next?
      2) In 1994, we promised to protect Ukraine if they would only get rid of their nuclear weapons. That IS a moral obligation that I hate because I have a son in the army.
      3) What about all the energy resources (and gas pipeline) in Eastern Ukraine? Allowing Russia to control this puts an even greater stranglehold on Europe's
      energy needs.
       
      Scotchlass, Mar 6, 2022
    3. BigSuzyB
      BigSuzyB, Mar 6, 2022
      stumbler likes this.
    4. stumbler
      As one of the Ukrainian legislators pointed out recently yes they still have problems with corruption but Ukraine has only been a country for a little over 30 years. She used American history to draw the comparison where the US was when it was on;y 30 years old.

      And the real problem with Ukraine is they are actually too prosperous and innovative. and that is what Putin cannot tolerate. Because people in Russia will be able to look at that and want to be more like them.
       
      stumbler, Mar 6, 2022
    5. Scotchlass
      @BigSuzy: You already know Ukraine doesn’t matter to the US, it’s also important to know there’s no moral case for supporting Ukraine either. A country that arrests the opposition and bans media in an entire language is no “democracy.”
      And @BigSuzy added: If you have a Twitter account your can send your rebuttal to https://richardhanania.substack.com/p/lessons-from-forecasting-the-ukraine?s=r

      Nah. I don't do twitter. I'll let you transpose and forward my comments....
       
      Scotchlass, Mar 6, 2022
  19. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    The only way to stop Putin is for the people of Russia to stop him so this is pretty significant.

    Russia Detains More Than 2,500 Anti-War Protesters Across 49 Cities, Report Says



    As Russian President Vladimir Putin continues his bloody invasion of Ukraine, a growing number of Russians have taken to the streets in increasingly risky protests. Reuters reports that more than 2,500 people were detained across 49 Russian cities on Sunday, citing Russia-based monitoring group OVD-Info. Those protesters face imprisonment for their dissent, and are often held for days without chance of due process. On Sunday, the monitoring group said, many of the protesters were beaten as they were taken into custody. The protests in Russia mirrored those across the world, with people gathering in European and American cities in support of Ukrainian people. “The screws are being fully tightened,” Maria Kuznetsova, OVD-Info’s spokeswoman, told Reuters. “Essentially, we are witnessing military censorship.”

    Read it at Reuters

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/russi...anti-war-protesters-across-49-cities?ref=home
     
  20. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Didn't think there would be political prisoners held by the Russian Government soon?

    Fuck...we do it here in the U.S. why wouldn't Russia do it?